Home  /  Bylines  /  Essay

Northbound — Essay, 2025

The Narrator in the Machine

When software starts drafting our letters, summaries, and stories, who holds the pen? An essay on authorship, agency, and the strange new intimacy of ghostwritten lives.

Man at a typewriter in a library
The first draft is no longer always ours. The second one still can be.

The borrowed first draft

There is a particular vertigo in reading a paragraph you did not write and finding it adequate. Not brilliant, not yours — adequate. The essay begins there, in that small, honest discomfort, and follows it through newsrooms, classrooms, and publishing houses.

Editors I spoke to describe a new literacy: reading a draft and sensing where the human stopped. It is connoisseurship inverted — expertise deployed to detect absence rather than presence.

Every tool that writes for us is also, quietly, writing us — training our taste toward whatever it finds easiest to produce.

What remains ours

The piece argues against both panic and surrender. Panic mistakes the draft for the work; surrender mistakes convenience for voice. Between them lies the actual craft: judgment, revision, the willingness to delete a fluent paragraph because it is not true.

Threads the essay follows

  • The history of ghostwriting, from speeches to liner notes to autocomplete.
  • Why editors now read for rhythm as a test of provenance.
  • A modest proposal: sign the revisions, not just the draft.

An essay in the old sense

Written as an attempt rather than a verdict, the piece moves associatively — through a copy desk at midnight, a seminar table, and a novelist's shed — gathering evidence for the unfashionable idea that difficulty is part of meaning.

Portrait of Elliot Vance, a man with glasses in a dark library
Elliot Vance

Reporter and essayist writing about work, technology and the people who live with both. Based in New York.

Commission an essay

Criticism and reported essays for magazines and quarterlies. Send your brief.

Get in touch